1) Reasoning efficiency: Falcon H1R-7B
TII’s Falcon H1R-7B is positioned as a reasoning-specialised model that challenges “bigger is better”. The headline claim is that a 7B-parameter system can outperform larger comparators on math and coding benchmarks.
- Hybrid backbone: Transformer–Mamba2 framing, paired with a very long context claim (256k).
- DeepConf filtering: discards low-quality reasoning traces during generation to improve the accuracy/token-cost trade.
Key benchmark snapshot (as reported)
| Benchmark | Falcon H1R-7B | Comparator | Comparator score |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME-24 (Math) | 88.1% | Apriel 1.5 (15B) | 86.2% |
| AIME-25 (Math) | 83.1% | Apriel 1.5 (15B) | 80.0% |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 68.6% | Qwen3 (32B) | ~61% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72.1% | Qwen3 (8B) | <65% |
Note: figures are presented as provided in your brief; no independent verification is performed in this static page.
2) Infrastructure as strategy: Articul8 & Grab
“Enterprise AI” is maturing along two paths: capital-backed full-stack platforms and vertically integrated operational AI (including robotics).
3) The end of “vanilla” RAG: Databricks instructed retriever
Databricks’ Instructed Retriever reframes retrieval as system-level reasoning. Instead of treating search as a similarity lookup, it can decompose constraints into an executable plan (e.g., date filters, exclusions, metadata reasoning).
Legacy RAG vs instructed retrieval
- Similarity-first matching
- Weak at negative constraints
- Requires custom filtering glue
- Plans the retrieval steps
- Handles constraints and exclusions
- More robust out-of-the-box
Summary for practitioners
Sources
Add links here as you publish/collect them. (Today’s draft did not include URLs.)